MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038572925 · doi:10.2523/iptc-16416-ms

Foam Assisted Air Injection (FAAI) for IOR at Hailaer Oilfield: Prospects and Challenges

2013· article· en· W2038572925 on OpenAlex
Bojun Wang, Liang Jinzhong, Youwei Jiang, Kong Fan-zhong, Jiachun Wang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Petroleum Technology Conference · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSecondary air injectionPetroleum engineeringWater injection (oil production)InjectorEnvironmental scienceEnhanced oil recoveryAir permeability specific surfaceMaterials scienceGeologyWaste managementComposite materialEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Xi11-72 Block, located in Hailaer Oilfield, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, China, contains many ultra-low permeability (<2.0×10-3µm2) oil reservoirs, with natural fractures. The reservoir temperature is 82°C; the original reservoir pressure is approximately 22.5 MPa; and the water-sensitive index of the reservoir is high (>0.7). Primary production and limited water flooding experience at adjacent Blocks have shown that the recovery factor in these reservoirs is very low due to lack of reservoir energy and poor water injectivity. Since 2009, Foam Assisted Air Injection (FAAI) has been proposed, in order to block natural fractures, maintain reservoir pressure and/or increase sweeping and displacement efficiency. A series of laboratory experiments have been conducted to study the oxidation kinetics of air/air foam with oil and the blocking and displacement efficiency of air foams in different oil sands. Reservoir simulation has also been carried out for predicting the reservoir response to foam assisted air injection and optimizing the injection process. Air injection pilot test started in the field since 23 April 2011 in a well group with 1 injector and 6 producers, using a Skid-mounted high pressure air compressor (40 MPa, 7 m3/min air rate). Oxygen breakthrough was observed (oxygen contents 3.7%) on 13 May 2011, and then assisted foam was injected to inhibit air breakthrough. Up to 30 June 2011, five foam slugs had been injected into the reservoir. The field results show that air injection can enhance injection capacity; assisted foam injection can inhibit air breakthrough effectively; and oil production can be significantly increased with water cut reduced by 4%. The detailed laboratory study, field experience and prospects and challenges analysis are presented in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.576
Threshold uncertainty score0.790

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it