MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038576407 · doi:10.1071/rdv26n1ab208

208 SUPEROVULATORY RESPONSE AND EMBRYO PRODUCTION IN HOLSTEIN COWS FED DIETS ENRICHED IN OLEIC, LINOLEIC, OR a-LINOLENIC ACID

2013· article· en· W2038576407 on OpenAlexaffabout
Reza Salehi, M.G. Colazo, A. Behrouzi, A. Ruiz-Sanchez, M. Oba, Michael K. Dyck, D.J. Ambrose

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicFatty Acid Research and Health
Canadian institutionsAgriculture Food and Rural DevelopmentUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinoleic acidLinolenic acidOleic acidBiologyAnimal scienceEmbryo cultureFatty acidEmbryoFood scienceEmbryogenesisBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early embryonic development is enhanced in Holstein cows fed diets enriched in linoleic and a-linolenic acids compared to those fed a diet enriched in stearic fatty acid (Thangavelu et al. 2007; Theriogenology 68, 949–957). A positive effect of oleic acid on oocyte competence in vitro has been reported (Aardema et al. 2011; Biol. Reprod. 85, 62–69), but the influence of oleic acid on early embryonic development has not been investigated. Therefore, our objective was to evaluate the effects of diets enriched in oleic, linoleic, or a-linolenic acid on superovulatory response and embryo production. Non-lactating Holstein cows were blocked by parity and bodyweight, and assigned to one of three diets supplemented with canola (CAN, n = 8; 62% oleic acid), sunflower (SUN, n = 7; 73% linoleic acid), or flax (FLX, n = 8; 57% a-linolenic acid). Cows were individually offered hay (9.4 kg) and concentrate mixture (4.1 kg) supplemented with one of the three rolled oilseeds (~8% of dietary dry matter). After a minimum of 21 days of diet adaptation, cows were given FSH (300 mg total dose, eight 12-hourly injections), artificially inseminated twice, 12 h apart, with semen of the same sire and ova/embryos recovered non-surgically 7.5 days post-insemination. Once started on a diet, cows continued to receive the same diet until the end of the experiment. Thirty-five collections (flushing) were performed (CAN: 12, SUN: 11 and FLX: 12) and data were analysed using the GENMOD procedure of SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA); results are presented as mean ± s.e. Number of corpora lutea (12.8 ± 2.6, 14.5 ± 1.2 and 13.1 ± 1.5), anovulated follicles (3.0 ± 1.4, 2.0 ± 1.1 and 2.6 ± 0.9), and total ova/embryos (7.5 ± 2.0, 8.6 ± 1.7 and 7.3 ± 1.2) did not differ (P > 0.05) for CAN, SUN, and FLX treatment, respectively. Cows fed SUN tended (P = 0.06) to produce more transferable embryos (6.1 ± 1.7) than those fed CAN (4.3 ± 1.5), but did not differ from those fed FLX (4.8 ± 1.3). There were fewer (P < 0.05) unfertilized ova in cows fed SUN (0.6 ± 0.5) than in those fed either CAN (1.3 ± 0.6) or FLX (1.8 ± 0.9). Conversely, cows fed FLX had fewer (P < 0.05) degenerated embryos (0.7 ± 0.4) compared to those fed either CAN (1.9 ± 0.6) or SUN (1.9 ± 0.5). The number of expanded blastocysts was greater (P < 0.05) in cows fed CAN (1.08 ± 0.57) than in those fed FLX (0.25 ± 0.25), but it was not different from those fed SUN (0.90 ± 0.36). In summary, the type of dietary fatty acid did not affect superovulatory response, but a diet enriched in oleic acid resulted in more expanded blastocysts, whereas a diet enriched in linoleic acid significantly reduced the number of unfertilized ova and numerically increased transferable embryos. The diet enriched in a-linolenic acid resulted in fewer degenerated embryos. This study was supported by Alberta Meat and Livestock Agency, Alberta Milk, and Alberta Innovates-BioSolutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicFatty Acid Research and HealthFrench-language works237,207