MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038629064 · doi:10.1109/lcn.2012.6423651

Mobility based dynamic TXOP for vehicular communication

2012· article· en· W2038629064 on OpenAlexaff
Hikmat El Ajaltouni, Azzedine Boukerche, Richard W. Pazzi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer networkComputer scienceQuality of serviceVehicular ad hoc networkReservationWireless ad hoc networkWirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the mobile nature of nodes comprising the vehicular networks in addition to interference and congested network traffic, the design of an efficient MAC network becomes challenging. Moreover, the latency constraints underlying safety application add complexity to this design. The TXOP (Transmit Opportunity) mechanism defined in the IEEE 802.11e is optimized to meet the requirements of a Multimedia Network (voice and audio) but not a vehicular network thus making it unsuitable to be used in a VANet environment. On the other hand, existing MAC algorithms for VANets are designed to overcome some challenges overlooking others. Hence, the merit of this paper lies in developing a MAC mechanism that incorporates in an integrated manner various VANet's challenges while modifying the 802.11e TXOP to meet vehicular conditions. In this work, we propose MoByToP (Mobility Based Dynamic TXOP for VANets). MoByToP is an enhancement mechanism added to the MAC layer to extend the operation of the medium reservation phase. The uniqueness of MoByToP lies in designing a dynamic TXOP to incorporate mobility and QoS (Quality of Service) while considering the transmit data rate of the source vehicle. The proposed protocol was implemented in OMNET++4.1 and extensive experiments demonstrated that the proposed MAC with MoByToP mechanism ensures the reception of QoS messages much faster, more efficient and reliable than existing VANet MAC protocols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.205

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207