Usefulness of postischemic thrombolysis with or without neuroprotection in a focal embolic model of cerebral ischemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECT: Recent studies have shown that the use of thrombolysis in the setting of acute stroke is associated with an increased risk of cerebral hemorrhage. The time of onset of symptoms to initiation of medication and the dose levels of the thrombolytic agents are important determinants for the risk of cerebral hemorrhage. The authors evaluated the time course of thrombolysis-related hemorrhages in experimental settings and tested whether the addition of neuroprotective medication augments the efficacy of thrombolysis and reduces the incidence of hemorrhages. METHODS: Male Wistar rats were subjected to right middle cerebral artery embolization with an autologous thrombus and were then randomly assigned to one of the following groups: Group 1, saline-treated (2 hours after ischemic insult) animals as controls; Groups 2 to 4, high-dose urokinase (5,000 U/kg) at 2, 3, and 6 hours after the insult; Group 5, low-dose urokinase (2,500 U/kg) at 2 hours after the insult; Group 6, 20 mg/kg topiramate (TPM) at 2 hours after the insult; Group 7, a combination of 20 mg/kg TPM at 2 hours and low-dose urokinase (2,500 U/kg) at 6 hours after the insult; and Group 8, 20 mg/kg TPM (20 mg/kg) at 2 hours and high-dose urokinase (5,000 U/kg) at 2 hours after the insult. Neurological behavior and the infarct volume in the brain were assessed following cerebral embolism and the various treatments. All animals in the single therapy and low-dose combination groups survived surgery. Three of eight animals treated with high-dose urokinase alone at 6 hours and three of six animals in the combined high-dose urokinase and TPM group developed fatal intracerebral hemorrhages. There was a significantly better neurological outcome at 24 hours in the animals treated with either medication compared with controls. The volume of the infarct in the saline-treated group was 54.2 +/- 9%. The use of TPM at 2 hours led to a decrease in the infarct to 20.1 +/- 11.2% (p < 0.01). Treatment with urokinase at 6 hours after the occlusion showed a trend toward protection; the infarct volume was 31.9 +/- 14.1% (p < 0.05). The addition of TPM to low- or high-dose urokinase achieved better neuroprotection (8.2 +/- 6% and 11.9 +/- 10.7%, respectively; both p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this study the authors show that the volume of the infarct can be significantly decreased with 2 to 6-hour delayed intraarterial thrombolysis with urokinase and that the efficacy of thrombolysis may be enhanced by combining neuroprotective agents like TPM. It is also shown that low-dose combination therapy may decrease the likelihood of cerebral hemorrhage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".