MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038658242 · doi:10.3171/jns.2000.92.5.0841

Usefulness of postischemic thrombolysis with or without neuroprotection in a focal embolic model of cerebral ischemia

2000· article· en· W2038658242 on OpenAlexaff
Yi Yang, Qui Li, Hero Miyashita, Wendy Howlett, Muzaffar Siddiqui, Ashfaq Shuaib

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of neurosurgery · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUrokinaseThrombolysisNeuroprotectionAnesthesiaIschemiaMiddle cerebral arteryThrombusSalineStroke (engine)SurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECT: Recent studies have shown that the use of thrombolysis in the setting of acute stroke is associated with an increased risk of cerebral hemorrhage. The time of onset of symptoms to initiation of medication and the dose levels of the thrombolytic agents are important determinants for the risk of cerebral hemorrhage. The authors evaluated the time course of thrombolysis-related hemorrhages in experimental settings and tested whether the addition of neuroprotective medication augments the efficacy of thrombolysis and reduces the incidence of hemorrhages. METHODS: Male Wistar rats were subjected to right middle cerebral artery embolization with an autologous thrombus and were then randomly assigned to one of the following groups: Group 1, saline-treated (2 hours after ischemic insult) animals as controls; Groups 2 to 4, high-dose urokinase (5,000 U/kg) at 2, 3, and 6 hours after the insult; Group 5, low-dose urokinase (2,500 U/kg) at 2 hours after the insult; Group 6, 20 mg/kg topiramate (TPM) at 2 hours after the insult; Group 7, a combination of 20 mg/kg TPM at 2 hours and low-dose urokinase (2,500 U/kg) at 6 hours after the insult; and Group 8, 20 mg/kg TPM (20 mg/kg) at 2 hours and high-dose urokinase (5,000 U/kg) at 2 hours after the insult. Neurological behavior and the infarct volume in the brain were assessed following cerebral embolism and the various treatments. All animals in the single therapy and low-dose combination groups survived surgery. Three of eight animals treated with high-dose urokinase alone at 6 hours and three of six animals in the combined high-dose urokinase and TPM group developed fatal intracerebral hemorrhages. There was a significantly better neurological outcome at 24 hours in the animals treated with either medication compared with controls. The volume of the infarct in the saline-treated group was 54.2 +/- 9%. The use of TPM at 2 hours led to a decrease in the infarct to 20.1 +/- 11.2% (p < 0.01). Treatment with urokinase at 6 hours after the occlusion showed a trend toward protection; the infarct volume was 31.9 +/- 14.1% (p < 0.05). The addition of TPM to low- or high-dose urokinase achieved better neuroprotection (8.2 +/- 6% and 11.9 +/- 10.7%, respectively; both p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this study the authors show that the volume of the infarct can be significantly decreased with 2 to 6-hour delayed intraarterial thrombolysis with urokinase and that the efficacy of thrombolysis may be enhanced by combining neuroprotective agents like TPM. It is also shown that low-dose combination therapy may decrease the likelihood of cerebral hemorrhage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.640

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of neurosurgerySame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207