MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038665276 · doi:10.1021/ja910886g

Columnar Organization of Head-to-Tail Self-Assembled Pt<sub>4</sub> Rings

2010· article· en· W2038665276 on OpenAlexafffund
Peter D. Frischmann, Samuel Guieu, R. Tabeshi, Mark J. MacLachlan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSupramolecular Chemistry and Complexes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryCrystallographySelf-assemblyTransmission electron microscopyLyotropic liquid crystalDynamic light scatteringSupramolecular chemistryNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopyLyotropicStereochemistryCrystal structureNanotechnologyNanoparticlePolymerOrganic chemistryLiquid crystallineMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coordination of Pt(2+) to a family of tunable Schiff base proligands directs the 12-component self-assembly of disk-shaped Pt(4) rings in a head-to-tail fashion. Aggregation of these S(4) symmetric Pt(4) macrocycles into columnar architectures was investigated by dynamic and static light scattering, NMR spectroscopy, powder X-ray diffraction, and transmission electron microscopy. Data from these experiments support the formation of columnar architectures for all of the structures studied except when bulky tris(4-tert-butylphenyl)methyl substituents were present. In this case, aggregation was limited to dimers in CHCl(3) (K(dim) = 3200 +/- 200 L mol(-1) at 25 degrees C) and a thermodynamic analysis revealed that dimerization is an entropy driven process. Columnar architectures of Pt(4) rings with branched 2-hexyldecyl substituents organize into lyotropic mesophases in nonpolar organic solvents. These new self-assembled supramolecules are promising candidates to access nanotubes with multiple linear arrays of Pt(2+) ions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations72
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicSupramolecular Chemistry and ComplexesFrench-language works237,207