Wnt-5A augments repopulating capacity and primitive hematopoietic development of human blood stem cells <i>in</i> <i>vivo</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Human hematopoietic stem cells are defined by their ability to repopulate multiple hematopoietic lineages in the bone marrow of transplanted recipients and therefore are functionally distinct from hematopoietic progenitors detected in vitro. Although factors capable of regulating progenitors are well established, in vivo regulators of hematopoietic repopulating function are unknown. By using a member of the vertebrate Wnt family, Wnt-5A, the proliferation and differentiation of progenitors cocultured on stromal cells transduced with Wnt-5A or treated with Wnt-5A conditioned medium (CM) was unaffected. However, i.p. injection of Wnt-5A CM into mice engrafted with human repopulating cells increased multilineage reconstitution by >3-fold compared with controls. Furthermore, in vivo treatment of human repopulating cells with Wnt-5A CM produced a greater proportion of phenotypically primitive hematopoietic progeny that could be isolated and shown to possess enhanced progenitor function independent of continued Wnt-5A treatment. Our study demonstrates that Wnt-5A augments primitive hematopoietic development in vivo and represents an in vivo regulator of hematopoietic stem cell function in the human. Based on these findings, we suggest a potential role for activation of Wnt signaling in managing patients exhibiting poor hematopoietic recovery shortly after stem cell transplantation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".