Student Teachers’ Self-perception of their Mathematical Skills and their Conceptions about Teaching Mathematics in Primary Schools
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research has shown that more often than not beliefs rather than knowledge are major determinants in pedagogical decisions that teachers make in the classroom (Doudin, Pons, Martin & Lafortune, 2003). Self-perceptions appear to be strongly influenced by students’ relationship with mathematical contents and students’ perceptions about their own ability to master these contents. The importance of self-perceptions, beliefs and pre-conceptions in decision making leads to this question: does student teachers’ self-perception of their mathematical competence influence their conceptions about mathematics teaching? To answer this question we compared the results obtained from two questionnaires administered to student teachers. The first questionnaire focused on conceptions about teaching mathematics while the second focused on self-perceptions in mathematics. This paper analyzes in the context of Boyer's Dialectical reconstruction of knowledge model (Boyer & Mailloux, 2012) the links between student teachers’ conceptions about mathematics education and their perceptions of their own mathematical skills.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".