Lack of Tir Ubiquitylation Contributes to Enteropathogenic <i>E. coli</i> Remaining Extracellular During Nonphagocytic Cell Infections
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) is an extracellular pathogen that alters many host subcellular components during its infectious processes. We have previously shown that EPEC hijacks a large assortment of host cell endocytic components and uses these proteins to form protruding structures called "pedestals" rather than triggering internalization of the bacteria. Other invasive pathogens that also recruit similar endocytic components have been shown to enter their host cells on the ubiquitylation of their host cell receptors. Therefore, we hypothesize that EPEC remains extracellular by maintaining its receptor, translocated intimin receptor (Tir), in an unubiquitylated state. Using immunoprecipitation-Western blots, we demonstrate no association of ubiquitin with Tir. To further elucidate the effect Tir ubiquitylation would have on EPEC during their infections, we engineered Tir-ubiquitin fusion constructs, expressed them in host epithelial cells, and infected them with Δtir EPEC. We found these cells induced a significant increase in EPEC invasion as compared with cells that expressed the Tir construct that lacked ubiquitin conjugation. Our results indicate that the lack of EPEC receptor ubiquitylation is a contributing factor that these microbes use to prevent their internalization into epithelial cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".