Experimental Investigation of Flow-Acoustic Coupling in a Deep Axisymmetric Cavity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, the phenomenon of self-sustained pressure oscillations due to the flow past a deep, circular, axisymmetric cavity is investigated. In many engineering applications, such as flows through open gate valves, there exists potential for coupling between the vortex shedding from the upstream edge of the cavity and a diametral mode of the acoustic pressure fluctuations. In the present study, the unsteady pressure was measured at several azimuthal locations at the bottom of the cavity walls, and the associated acoustic mode shapes were calculated numerically for the four representative cases of the internal cavity geometry, which involved a reference case with sharp, 90°edges as well as several modifications that involved chamfers of various length of the upstream and the downstream edges of the cavity. In addition, the flow velocity in the vicinity of the cavity opening in selected cases was measured using digital particle image velocimetry (PIV). The optical access to the highly confined internal flow was provided by implementing an endoscope attached to the camera. This global, quantitative imaging approach yielded patterns of velocity, streamlines and out-of-plane vorticity component. Instantaneous and time-averaged flow patterns provided insight into the mechanism of the flow tone generation. Among the considered cavity geometries, the configuration that corresponded to the most efficient noise suppression was identified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".