Sulfobetaine zwitterionomers based on <i>n</i>‐butyl acrylate and 2‐ethoxyethyl acrylate: Physical properties
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract New materials with potential applications for adhesives and coatings, based on copolymers containing zwitterionic pendent groups, were investigated. n ‐Butyl acrylate and 2‐ethoxyethyl acrylate were copolymerized with a series of five zwitterionic sulfobetaine monomers (SBMs). The structures of the SBMs were varied systematically in terms of (1) intercharge spacing in the zwitterionic moiety and (2) substituent bulkiness at the quaternary ammonium functionality. The effect of varying the sulfobetaine content and structure in the copolymers was investigated, with an emphasis on ion aggregation behavior and physical properties, with dynamic mechanical analysis. The zwitterionomers exhibited the expected biphasic morphology, with the appearance of an ion‐rich glass‐transition temperature. An increase in the storage modulus was observed with increasing SBM content in the rubbery and terminal regions, suggesting an increased degree of ionic crosslinking in the rubbery region and decreased chain mobility in the flow region. Intercharge spacing variation in the sulfobetaine moiety did not have a significant effect on the modulus–temperature curves, contrary to our expectations. Increases in the modulus were much less pronounced for the bulkier SBMs than for the other monomers, possibly because of hindered aggregation of the sulfobetaine moieties. Likewise, matrix polarity had a greater influence on the physical properties of these materials than intercharge separation in the SBMs. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 40: 2303–2312, 2002
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it