Colonization with <i>Schizophyllum commune</i> of Localized Honeycomb Lung with Mucus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report a surgical case involving localized honeycomb lung with mucus, caused by colonization of a Schizophyllum commune, which displayed a tumorous shadow in the right upper mediastinum. A 74-year-old male with a history of tuberculosis in the 1970s was referred to Chiba University Hospital (Chiba, Japan) with an abnormal shadow evident in the chest roentgenogram. A transbronchial biopsy failed to yield a definite diagnosis. We resected the right upper lobe, which was found to contain a consolidative lesion filled with viscous mucus in the right upper lobe adjacent to the right upper mediastinum. Microscopic examination revealed a honeycomb lung formation with mucus in the destroyed space. Culture of the mucus yielded a whitish filamentous fungus, positively identified as S. commune. This is the first report of S. commune leading to a deposit of mucus and the formation of a consolidative lesion in the destroyed lung.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".