MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038771520 · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.03.056

Central Role of ULK1 in Type I Interferon Signaling

2015· article· en· W2038771520 on OpenAlexaff
Diana Saleiro, Swarna Mehrotra, Barbara Kroczyńska, Elspeth M. Beauchamp, Paweł Lisowski, Beata Majchrzak-Kita, Tushar D. Bhagat, Brady L. Stein, Brandon McMahon, Jessica K. Altman, Ewa M. Kościuczuk, Darren P. Baker, Chunfa Jie, Nadereh Jafari, Craig B. Thompson, Ross L. Levine, Eleanor N. Fish, Amit Verma, Leonidas C. Platanias

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersNational Cancer InstituteUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoNorthwestern UniversityU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsULK1InterferonBiologyProtein kinase ACancer researchTranscription factorCell biologyMediatorRegulatorMAPK/ERK pathwayp38 mitogen-activated protein kinasesKinaseSignal transductionGeneImmunologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We provide evidence that the Unc-51-like kinase 1 (ULK1) is activated during engagement of the type I interferon (IFN) receptor (IFNR). Our studies demonstrate that the function of ULK1 is required for gene transcription mediated via IFN-stimulated response elements (ISRE) and IFNγ activation site (GAS) elements and controls expression of key IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs). We identify ULK1 as an upstream regulator of p38α mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and establish that the regulatory effects of ULK1 on ISG expression are mediated possibly by engagement of the p38 MAPK pathway. Importantly, we demonstrate that ULK1 is essential for antiproliferative responses and type I IFN-induced antineoplastic effects against malignant erythroid precursors from patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. Together, these data reveal a role for ULK1 as a key mediator of type I IFNR-generated signals that control gene transcription and induction of antineoplastic responses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations75
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell ReportsSame topicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207