MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038776626 · doi:10.1080/15265160903197671

What To Do When the Risk Environment Is Rapidly Shifting and Heterogeneous? Anticipatory Governance and Real-Time Assessment of Social Risks in Multiply Marginalized Populations Can Prevent IRB Mission Creep, Ethical Inflation or Underestimation of Risks

2009· letter· en· W2038776626 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Vural Özdemir

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Bioethics · 2009
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsSalaryCorporate governanceResearch ethicsSociologyPsychologyPolitical scienceManagementLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Acknowledgment The views expressed in the commentary are entirely the personal opinions of the author. The work in this manuscript is supported by an ethics operating catalyst grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and a career investigator salary for science and society research from the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec (FRSQ). The figure was conceived by Ozdemir and drawn as an illustration by the Montreal based artist Debbie Geltner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.438
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.425
GPT teacher head0.493
Teacher spread0.068 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of BioethicsSame topicHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207