Properties and Substrate of Slow Pathway Exposed with a Compact Node Targeted Fast Pathway Ablation in Rabbit Atrioventricular Node
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The properties and substrates of slow and fast AV nodal pathway remain unclear. This applies particularly to the slow pathway (SP), which is largely concealed by fast pathway (FP) conduction. We designed a new FP ablation approach that exposes the SP over the entire cycle length range and allows for its independent characterization and ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Premature stimulation was performed before and after FP ablation with 5.4 +/- 1.9 lesions (300-microm diameter each; overall lesion size 1.4 +/- 0.5 mm) targeting the junction between perinodal and compact node tissues in seven rabbit heart preparations. The resulting SP recovery curve and control curve had the same maximum nodal conduction time (165 +/- 22 msec vs 164 +/- 24 msec; P = NS) and effective refractory period (101 +/- 10 msec vs 100 +/- 9 msec; P = NS). The two curves covered the same cycle length range. However, the SP curve was shifted up with respect to control one at intermediate and long cycle lengths and thus showed a longer minimum nodal conduction time (81 +/- 15 msec vs 66 +/- 10 msec; P < 0.01) and functional refractory period (180 +/- 11 msec vs 170 +/- 12 msec; P < 0.05). The SP curve was continuous and closely fitted by a single exponential function. Small local lesions (2 +/- 1) applied to the posterior nodal extension resulted in third-degree nodal block in all preparations. CONCLUSION: The posterior nodal extension can sustain effective atrial-His conduction at all cycle lengths and account for both the manifest and concealed portion of SP. Slow and FP conduction primarily arise from the posterior extension and compact node, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".