A Multi-Atlas-Based Segmentation Framework for Prostate Brachytherapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Low-dose-rate brachytherapy is a radiation treatment method for localized prostate cancer. The standard of care for this treatment procedure is to acquire transrectal ultrasound images of the prostate in order to devise a plan to deliver sufficient radiation dose to the cancerous tissue. Brachytherapy planning involves delineation of contours in these images, which closely follow the prostate boundary, i.e., clinical target volume. This process is currently performed either manually or semi-automatically, which requires user interaction for landmark initialization. In this paper, we propose a multi-atlas fusion framework to automatically delineate the clinical target volume in ultrasound images. A dataset of a priori segmented ultrasound images, i.e., atlases, is registered to a target image. We introduce a pairwise atlas agreement factor that combines an image-similarity metric and similarity between a priori segmented contours. This factor is used in an atlas selection algorithm to prune the dataset before combining the atlas contours to produce a consensus segmentation. We evaluate the proposed segmentation approach on a set of 280 transrectal prostate volume studies. The proposed method produces segmentation results that are within the range of observer variability when compared to a semi-automatic segmentation technique that is routinely used in our cancer clinic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".