The Biomechanical Effect of Torsion on Humeral Shaft Repair Techniques for Completed Pathological Fractures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the presence of a tumor defect, completed humeral shaft fractures continue to be a major surgical challenge since there is no "gold standard" treatment. This is due, in part, to the fact that only one prior biomechanical study exists on the matter, but which only compared 2 repair methods. The current authors measured the humeral torsional performance of 5 fixation constructs for completed pathological fractures. In 40 artificial humeri, a 2-cm hemi-cylindrical cortical defect with a transverse fracture was created in the lateral cortex. Specimens were divided into 5 different constructs and tested in torsion. Construct A was a broad 10-hole 4.5-mm dynamic compression plate (DCP). Construct B was the same as A except that the screw holes and the tumor defect were filled with bone cement and the screws were inserted into soft cement. Construct C was the same as A except that the canal and tumor defect were filled with bone cement and the screws were inserted into dry cement. Construct D was a locked intramedullary nail inserted in the antegrade direction. Construct E was the same as D except that bone cement filled the defect. For torsional stiffness, construct C (4.45 ± 0.20 Nm/deg) was not different than B or E (p > 0.16), but was higher than A and D (p < 0.001). For failure torque, construct C achieved a higher failure torque (69.65 ± 5.35 Nm) than other groups (p < 0.001). For the failure angle, there were no differences between plating constructs A to C (p ≥ 0.11), except for B versus C (p < 0.05), or between nailing groups D versus E (p = 0.97), however, all plating groups had smaller failure angles than both nailing groups (p < 0.05). For failure energy, construct C (17.97 ± 3.59 J) had a higher value than other groups (p < 0.005), except for A (p = 0.057). Torsional failure always occurred in the bone in the classic "spiral" pattern. Construct C provided the highest torsional stability for a completed pathological humeral shaft fracture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".