MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2038890611 · doi:10.2118/143301-ms

Novel Environmentally Friendly Fluids to Remove Carbonate Minerals from Deep Sandstone Formations

2011· article· en· W2038890611 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE European Formation Damage Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsAkzoNobel (Canada)
FundersAkzoNobel
KeywordsCarbonatePermeability (electromagnetism)Carbonate mineralsGeologyEnvironmentally friendlyChemistryDrilling fluidMineralogyGeochemical modelingMagnesiumChelationDrillingDolomiteGroundwaterInorganic chemistryGeotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Carbonate minerals are present in sandstone formations. These minerals are either introduced to the formation during drilling/completion operations or naturally present in the rock. There is a need to remove these carbonates to enhance well performance. This especially true if there is a need to use HF-based fluids to prevent the precipitation of calcium and magnesium fluorides. In this study, we introduced GLDA (L-glutamic acid-N,N-diaceticacid) a new environmentally friendly chelate to remove carbonate minerals from sandstone formations. We also compared its performance with available chelates like EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraaceticacid) and HEDTA (hydroxyethylenediaminetriaceticacid). Berea (5 wt% clays) and Bandera (11 wt% clays) sandstone cores were used in the coreflood experiments. The concentration of the chelates used was 0.6M at pH values of 11 and 4. The coreflood experiments were run at a flow rate of 5 cm3/min and 300°F. Coreflood experiments showed that at high pH values (pH =11) GLDA, HEDTA, and EDTA were almost the same in increasing the permeability of both Berea and Bandera sandstone cores. GLDA, HEDTA, and EDTA were compatible with Bandera sandstone cores. The weight loss from the core was highest in case of HEDTA and lowest in case of GLDA at pH 11. At pH 4, 0.6M-GLDA performed better than 0.6M HEDTA in the coreflood experiments. The permeability ratio (final/initial) for Bandera sandstone cores was 2 in the case of GLDA and 1.2 in the case of HEDTA at pH of 4, and 300°F. At pH 11, HEDTA, EDTA, and GLDA almost were the same in enhancing the permeability of the Bandera sandstone cores. At pH value of 4, GLDA gave the best results in Berea and Bandera sandstone cores.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it