MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039042733 · doi:10.1094/pdis-94-2-0275a

First Report of <i>Apricot latent virus</i> and <i>Plum bark necrosis stem pitting-associated virus</i> in Apricot from Spain

2010· article· en· W2039042733 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. García‐Ibarra, P. Martínez‐Gómez, M. Rubio, F. Dicenta, A. Soler, Vicente Pallás, Jesús Á. Sánchez-Navarro

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyAmpliconPrunusVirusPrunus armeniacaVirologyGenePlant virusPolymerase chain reactionBotanyCultivarGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Representing 2% of world production, 20,000 ha of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.), are cultivated in Spain, primarily in the southeast. A survey was conducted during the spring of 2008 in orchards in the region of Murcia to assess the incidence of several stone fruit viruses. Leaf and fruit samples from 160 trees from 40 orchards were collected randomly for reverse transcription (RT)-PCR analysis. Total RNA extracted (3) from leaves and fruits was tested by a multiplex one-step RT-PCR protocol with a mix of primers that detect eight distinct viruses (4). Amplicons of 250 bp expected for Plum bark necrosis stem pitting-associated virus (PBNSPaV), corresponding to part of the heat shock 70 protein gene, were obtained from four trees and amplicons of 700 bp expected for Apricot latent virus (ApLV), corresponding to part of the coat protein (CP) gene, were obtained from two trees. In all cases, amplicons were obtained using RNA extracted from leaf and fruit tissues. RT-PCR results were confirmed by uniplex RT-PCR with primers specific for each virus and dot-blot hybridization with virus-specific digoxygenin-labeled RNA probes (2). To further characterize the new viruses, we designed primers to amplify specifically the CP gene of ApLV (5'-CCCGACCATGGCTACAAGC-3' and 5'-TTGCCGTCCCGATTAGGTTG-3') and the minor CP gene of PBNSPaV (5'-GAACAAACTACAGCAGCACC-3' and 5'-CAAGGGTAGGACGGGTAACGC-3'). Amplicons of 1,500 and 950 bp corresponding to the ApLV and PBNSPaV CP genes, respectively, were purified from agarose gels and cloned in the pTZ57R plasmid (Fermentas, Burlington, Ontario, Canada). Blastp analysis of the full-length ApLV CP sequence from one infected tree (GenBank Accession No. GQ919051) revealed 86% amino acid (aa) similarity to the single full-length ApLV CP sequence available (No. AAC16234) and 79 and 66.9% similarity to Peach sooty ringspot virus (No. AAG48314) and Apple stem pitting virus (No. NP604468), respectively. Identity/similarity analysis of the full-length PBNSPaV minor CP genes using the Matrix Global Alignment Tool software, version 2.02 (1), revealed 98.8 to 99.6% aa similarity between the Spanish PBNSPaV isolates (Nos. GQ919047, GQ919048, GQ919049, and GQ919050) and 97.1 to 97.4% with the PBNSPaV isolate from the United States (No. EF546442). None of the six infected trees were associated with any particular field symptoms. Five infected trees were cv. Búlida and one was native cv. Murciana, which was infected with ApLV. All infected trees were located in geographically separated orchards. The incidence of ApLV and PBNSPaV was 1.25 and 2.5%, respectively. The low incidence of both viruses together with the scattered geographic distribution could be due to the recent introduction of virus-contaminated plants, although we cannot exclude that it is a consequence of a low dissemination rate. Even though no symptoms were observed, we cannot discard that the infection could affect fruit production or flowering or even cause a synergistic effect in mixed infection with other stone fruit viruses, a risk especially relevant considering the total area of cultivated apricot. To our knowledge, this is the first report of ApLV and PBNSPaV in Spain. References: (1) J. J. Campanella et al. BMC Bioinformatics 4:29, 2003. (2) M. C. Herranz et al. J. Virol. Methods 124:49, 2005. (3) D. J. Mackenzie et al. Plant Dis. 81:222, 1997. (4) J. A. Sánchez-Navarro et al. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 111:77, 2005.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.634
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207