HIV-1 Tat Peptide Immunoconjugates Differentially Sensitize Breast Cancer Cells to Selected Antiproliferative Agents That Induce the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21<sup>WAF-1/CIP-1</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we evaluated the ability of anti-p21 antibodies conjugated to 17-mer peptides [GRKKRRQRRRPPQGYGC] harboring the membrane-translocating and nuclear import sequences [underlined] of HIV-1 tat protein to inhibit the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p21(WAF-1/Cip-1) (p21) and differentially sensitize MDA-MB-468 and MCF-7 human breast cancer (BC) cells to the antiproliferative effects of treatments that induce or do not induce p21. BC cells were treated with increasing concentrations of epidermal growth factor (EGF; 0.5-10 nM), the topoisomerase I inhibitor, camptothecin (CPT; 0.1-4 muM), or increasing doses of gamma-radiation (2-20 Gy). Western blot was used to evaluate p21 expression. The effect of treatment on cell cycle distribution was studied. Growth inhibition was measured by the WST-1 assay. Expression of p21 was increased in MDA-MB-468 cells treated with EGF or CPT but not by gamma-irradiation. MCF-7 cells exhibited p21 upregulation following exposure to CPT and gamma-radiation but not EGF. EGF caused cell cycle arrest in G(1) phase for MDA-MB-468 cells. CPT caused G(1)-phase arrest in MDA-MB-468 cells and prolonged S phase in MCF-7 cells. gamma-Radiation caused an increase in cells in G(2)/M phase for MDA-MB-468 and MCF-7. MDA-MB-468 cells were growth-inhibited by EGF, CPT, and gamma-radiation. MCF-7 cells were growth-stimulated by EGF and inhibited by CPT and gamma-radiation. Combining EGF with tat-anti-p21 immunoconjugates (ICs) amplified the growth-inhibitory effect on MDA-MB-468 cells 1.2-fold to 2.3-fold, but had no effect on the growth stimulation of MCF-7 cells by EGF. Tat-anti-p21 ICs sensitized MCF-7 cells 1.4-fold to gamma-radiation but had no effect on the growth of gamma-irradiated MDA-MB-468 cells. Tat-anti-p21 ICs sensitized both MDA-MB-468 and MCF-7 cells 1.7-fold to CPT. We conclude that tat-anti-p21 ICs are promising sensitizers for cytotoxic cancer therapies and that their sensitization is dependent on treatment-related p21 expression. This general approach could potentially be extended to other growth-regulatory molecules that are associated with tumor growth and progression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".