Bibliographic record
Abstract
Remarque liminaire : le présent article témoigne de la genèse du projet documentaire commun aux bibliothèques de la Fondation PSL et de son état au début de l'année 2012.Si le Liberlabo n'est plus d'actualité dans tous ses aspects, il a paru toutefois intéressant de partager avec les publics, étudiants, chercheurs et enseignants-chercheurs, ces réflexions sur l'outil en pleine transformation qu'est la bibliothèque de recherche.2 Évoqué pour la première fois à la conférence de presse inaugurale du campus PSL, le 16 avril 2010, le projet d'un « Liberlabo » répond alors à une commande expresse dans le cadre du Plan Campus : imaginer, tout en promouvant la coopération documentaire souhaitée par les cinq chefs d'établissements concernés 1 , les services que pourrait offrir une bibliothèque de recherche, riche de nombreux fonds pluriséculaires, à l'horizon 2020.Sous ce vocable nouveau, « Liberlabo
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.069 | 0.022 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".