MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Two New Types of Ultrafast Aircraft Thermometer

2001· article· en· W2039082173 on OpenAlex
Krzysztof E. Haman, Szymon P. Malinowski, Bożena D. Struś, R. Busen, Andrzej Stefko

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResistance thermometerThermometerMaterials scienceAerodynamicsMeteorologyEnvironmental scienceMechanicsPhysicsTemperature measurementThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new version of an ultrafast aircraft resistance thermometer (UFT-F) with a time constant of the order 10−4 s,for use in both cloudy and cloudless air, is described. It evolved from an earlier version (UFT-S). Its sensing element is similar to that in UFT-S and consists of a 5-mm-long and 2.5-μm-thick platinum-coated tungsten wire, located on a rotatable vane behind a thin vertical rod that protects the sensor against direct impact of cloud droplets and other objects. Such construction introduces much smaller thermal disturbances than do more massive housings of other types of immersion thermometers and permits taking full advantage of low thermal inertia of the sensing wire. However, aerodynamic disturbances created by vortex shedding from the protective rod induce adiabatic fluctuations of temperature, which appear on the temperature records as “noise.” In the case of the UFT-S the level of this noise has become intolerable at airspeeds of about 40 m s−1, limiting applicability of this instrument to slow aircraft or gliders. For UFT-F the shape of the protective rod has been redesigned and endowed with a special system of reducing aerodynamic disturbances behind it, which made it usable at airspeeds up to 100 m s−1 in cloudless air or warm clouds. For use in supercooled clouds, a special variety of UFT-F (denoted here UFT-D) has been designed. As in its predecessor, its sensing element is a 5-mm-long, 2.5-μm-thick, platinum-coated tungsten resistive wire protected against impact of cloud droplets by an airfoil-shaped rod, but all its icing-sensitive parts are electrically heated to prevent buildup of ice. This modification required a total change of mechanical structure of the instrument. Tests during the Third Canadian Freezing Drizzle Experiment showed that UFT-D can perform fairly well in water clouds supercooled down to at least −8°C and that its heating system introduces no intolerable disturbances into the record. Use of UFT-D in ice or mixed clouds is limited by the fact that the protective rod is not effective enough against ice crystals bigger than about 200 μm, which can quickly destroy the delicate sensing element. The paper gives details of construction as well as results of wind tunnel and in-flight tests of these instruments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it