Global Cerebral Oxidative Metabolism during Hypercapnia and Hypocapnia in Humans: Implications for BOLD fMRI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of carbon dioxide (CO(2)) on cerebral metabolism is of tremendous interest to functional imaging. In particular, mild-to-moderate hypercapnia is routinely used in calibrated blood oxygen-level dependent (BOLD)-functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-based quantification of cerebral oxidative metabolism changes (DeltaCMRO(2)), and relies on the assumption of a stable CMRO(2) during CO(2) challenges. However, this assumption has been challenged by certain animal studies, necessitating its verification in humans and under conditions customary to fMRI. We report, for the first time, on global DeltaCMRO(2) measurements made noninvasively in humans during graded hypercapnia and hypocapnia. We used computerized end-tidal CO(2) modulation to minimize undesired concurrent changes in oxygen pressure, and our findings suggest that no significant change in global CMRO(2) is expected at the levels of end-tidal CO(2) changes customary to calibrated BOLD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".