MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039092150 · doi:10.1353/ces.2010.0010

Caribbean and Filipino Adolescents' and Parents' Perceptions of Parental Authority, Physical Punishment, and Cultural Values and Their Relation to Migratory Characteristics

2008· article· en· W2039092150 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
Ghayda Hassan, Cécile Rousseau, Toby Measham, Myrna Lashley

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian ethnic studies · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMigration, Health and Trauma
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University Health Centre
KeywordsAcculturationCognitive dissonancePsychologyPerceptionSocial psychologyImmigrationPunishment (psychology)Developmental psychologyPermissivePower (physics)Relation (database)GeographyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article describes the perceptions of parents and adolescents of physical punishment in relation to family and migratory characteristics. Adolescents and their parents of Caribbean (n=118) and of Filipino (n=136) heritage responded to questions on their attitude toward physical discipline, their family relations, and their socio-demographic and migratory characteristics. Data analyses show that many Caribbean (78%) and Filipino (41.9%) parents perceive that they should have the right to physically punish their children, while youth disagree with this. The dissonance between parents' and their children's attitudes is related to acculturation factors due to the earlier and more intense exposure of youth to their host society. Further studies should be conducted on the impact of the divergence between parents and their youth's opinions on the actual shifts in power in the parent-child relationship, as well as on immigrant parents' discipline strategies and on the family's adaptation to the challenges of migration. Cet article décrit, comment parents et adolescents perçoivent la punition physique. Des adolescents et leurs parents originaires des Caraïbes (n=118) et des Philippines (n=136) ont répondu à des questions portant sur leurs attitudes envers la punition physique, leurs relations familiales et leurs caractéristiques sociodémographiques et migratoires. Les analyses démontrent que plusieurs parents originaires des Caraïbes (78%) et des Philippines (41,9%) considèrent avoir le droit de punir physiquement leurs enfants, tandis que les adolescents sont majoritairement en désaccord. La dissonance observée entre les attitudes des parents et celles de leurs enfants est liée à des facteurs d'acculturation dus à l'exposition plus fréquente et dès un âge plus précoce des adolescents à leur société d'accueil. Les recherches futures devraient examiner l'impact qu'ont ces divergences de perceptions sur l'inversement des rapports de pouvoir parent-enfant, leur rapport avec les stratégies de discipline qu'emploient de préférence les parents et l'adaptation de la famille aux défis de l'immigration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian ethnic studiesSame topicMigration, Health and TraumaFrench-language works237,207