Metal‐Induced Specific and Nonspecific Oligonucleotide Folding Studied by FRET and Related Biophysical and Bioanalytical Implications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Metal induced nucleic acid folding has been extensively studied with ribozymes, DNAzymes, tRNA and riboswitches. These RNA/DNA molecules usually have a high content of double-stranded regions to support a rigid scaffold. On the other hand, such rigid structural features are not available for many in vitro selected or rationally designed DNA aptamers; they adopt flexible random coil structures in the absence of target molecules. Upon target binding, these aptamers adaptively fold into a compact structure with a reduced end-to-end distance, making fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) a popular signaling mechanism. However, nonspecific folding induced by mono- or divalent metal ions can also reduce the end-to-end distance and thus lead to false positive results. In this study we used a FRET pair labeled Hg(II) binding DNA and monitored metal-induced folding in the presence of various cations. While nonspecific electrostatically mediated folding can be very significant, at each tested salt condition, Hg(II) induced folding was still observed with a similar sensitivity. We also studied the biophysical meaning of the acceptor/donor fluorescence ratio that allowed us to explain the experimental observations. Potential solutions for this ionic strength problem have been discussed. For example, probes designed to signal the formation of double-stranded DNA showed a lower dependency on ionic strength.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".