Magnetic and Electrical Control of Electron-Nuclear Spin Coupling in GaAs Double Quantum Dots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We magnetically and electrically control spin coupling between electrons and nuclei in a vertical GaAs double quantum dot in the Pauli spin blockade regime to characterize the two-electron exchange energy and the dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP). The Pauli blockade is lifted by a hyperfine-mediated transition from an electron triplet state to the singlet state. This transition progressively occurs when the triplet-singlet separation or exchange energy J is compensated by tuning either Zeeman energy with external magnetic field (i.e., magnetic control) or inter-dot energy detuning with bias voltage (i.e., electrical control). The blockade is then lifted with a current step for sweeping up an external magnetic field. The J value, which is evaluated from the step position for various inter-dot detuning values, is consistent with calculation. DNP takes place through the hyperfine coupling near the current step, leading to a shifted current step to lower external magnetic field for the down-sweep. For the electrical control, a similar current step appears for sweeping bias voltage. In this case we are able to control the two-electron state energies in a relevant manner based on real time before DNP is significantly influenced, because the voltage sweep is much faster than the magnetic field sweep. We use this technique to distinguish the current step with and without DNP contributions, and therefore quantify the nuclear Overhauser fields with external magnetic field as a parameter. We present a simple phenomenological model to reproduce the experiment and also discuss a possible approach to realize the full DNP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".