MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039205914 · doi:10.4314/ijbcs.v5i3.72203

Performance socio-économique du système Agroforestier à <i>Acacia auriculiformis</i> dans la Lama au sud du Bénin

2011· article· fr· W2039205914 on OpenAlexaff
S. G. Akouehou, AG Agbahungba, J Houndehin, GA Mensah, B Sinsin

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAfrican Botany and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Natural Resources and Wildlife
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcacia auriculiformisHumanitiesForestryGeographyPolitical scienceArtAcaciaBotanyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au sud du Bénin, et plus particulièrement dans la plantation de la Lama, le manque de terre cultivable constitue un handicap à la survie des populations riveraines. Ainsi, dès 1980, l’administration forestière a intégré dans la gestion de la plantation, le système agroforestier à Acacia auriculiformis dite Taungya. Pour évaluer cette approche, les enquêtes effectuées sont basées sur un échantillonnage des exploitants agricoles à un taux de 10% intégrant le genre. Les petits producteurs (superficie entre 0 et 0,5 ha) sont les plus importants (90%) et utilisent plus une combinaison de la main d’oeuvre familiale et salariée. Cela explique le manque crucial de terre cultivable qui s’observe dans cette zone. Dans ce système, le bénéfice moyen engrangé par période d’exploitation est de 17467 fcfa. Les gros producteurs (superficie supérieure à 1 ha) par contre, n’utilisent pas uniquement la main d’oeuvre familiale et font un bénéfice de plus de 80000 fcfa par période d’exploitation. Ce système permet donc d’assurer un revenu aux populations et par ricochet, permet de palier au problème foncier dans la Lama.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationallow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Observationalhigh
models agreeAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Biological and Chemical SciencesSame topicAfrican Botany and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207