MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039282417 · doi:10.1139/w06-101

Acetylation and nitrosation of ciprofloxacin by environmental strains of mycobacteria

2007· article· en· W2039282417 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Michael D. Adjei, Thomas M. Heinze, Joanna Deck, James P. Freeman, A. J. Williams, John B. Sutherland

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Microbiology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicChemical Reactions and Isotopes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOak Ridge Institute for Science and EducationU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsNitrosationAcetylationMicrobiologyCiprofloxacinBiologyChemistryBacteriaBiochemistryAntibioticsGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To determine the ability of environmental bacteria to metabolize the frequently prescribed fluoroquinolone drug ciprofloxacin, eight Mycobacterium spp. cultures were grown for 4 days in a medium containing sorbitol and yeast extract with 100 mg x L(-1) ciprofloxacin. After the cultures had been centrifuged and the supernatants extracted with ethyl acetate, two metabolites were purified by using high-performance liquid chromatography. They were identified with liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry and proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Ciprofloxacin was transformed to both N-acetylciprofloxacin (2.5%-5.5% of the total peak area at 280 nm) and N-nitrosociprofloxacin (6.0%-8.0% of the peak area) by Mycobacterium gilvum PYR-GCK and Mycobacterium sp. PYR100 but it was transformed only to N-acetylciprofloxacin by Mycobacterium frederiksbergense FAn9, M. gilvum ATCC 43909, M. gilvum BB1, Mycobacterium smegmatis mc2155, Mycobacterium sp. 7E1B1W, and Mycobacterium sp. RJGII-135. The results suggest that biotransformation may serve as a ciprofloxacin resistance mechanism for these bacteria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MicrobiologySame topicChemical Reactions and IsotopesFrench-language works237,207