The Very Covalent Diammino(<i>o</i>-benzoquinonediimine) Dichlororuthenium(II). An Example of Very Strong π-Back-Donation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The syntheses and X-ray structures of the complexes Ru(S-dmso)Cl2(opda) (1) and Ru(NH3)2Cl2(bqdi) (2) are described (opda= o-phenylenediamine, bqdi= o-benzoquinonediimine). Optical absorption and emission, vibrational (resonance Raman), and electrochemical data are discussed. We explore the nature of the ruthenium benzoquinone electronic interaction in species 2 primarily within the framework of density functional theory (DFT) but also using INDO/S to extract Coulombic and exchange integrals. The resonance Raman and emission data were understood in terms of a common set of coupled vibrations localized primarily within the ruthenium metallacycle ring. Experimental and computational data were also compared among a select group of ruthenium bqdi species with other spectator ligands, specifically ammonia, 2,2'-bipyridine, and 2,4-pentanedione. The changes in the electrochemistry, optical spectroscopy, and vibrational spectra with changing spectator ligand donicity were explained within a common theoretical (DFT) model which further provided a detailed analysis of the variation in the molecular orbital descriptions. With the application of an extended charge decomposition analysis (ECDA), a detailed picture emerged of the bonding between the bqdi ligand and the metal atom, illustrating the coupling between the orbitals of each fragment as a function of orbital symmetry and charge transfer between the fragments of the complex. Metal-to-bqdi pi-back-donation is seen to be very important.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".