Processing and properties of PLA/thermoplastic starch/montmorillonite nanocomposites
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Thermoplastic starch (TPS) and polylactic acid (PLA) were compounded with natural montmorillonite (MMT) using a twin‐screw extrusion process to investigate the structure and properties of these nanocomposites and to examine the use of water to enhance clay exfoliation. Tensile and essential work of fracture measurements were performed on standard dumbbell shape samples and on double notched samples to determine the effect of MMT and PLA/TPS interfacial modification on the mechanical and fracture properties of the materials. The nanocomposite structure was investigated using X‐Ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, and atomic force microscopy. Differential scanning calorimetric analysis was performed on the materials to determine the effect of TPS and MMT on PLA crystallization and physical aging. It was found that the TPS can intercalate the clay structure and that the clay was preferentially located in the TPS phase or at the blend interface. This led to an improvement in tensile modulus and strength and to a reduction in fracture toughness. POLYM. COMPOS., 2010. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it