MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039452232 · doi:10.1159/000054936

Glucose and Glucoregulatory Modulation of Memory Scanning, Event-Related Potentials and EEG in Elderly Subjects

2001· article· en· W2039452232 on OpenAlexaff
Verner Knott, Claude Messier, Colleen Mahoney, Marc‐André Gagnon

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuropsychobiology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicMemory and Neural Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ottawa Mental Health CentreUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographyVigilance (psychology)PsychologyArousalAudiologyPlaceboEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceIngestionEvent-related potentialCognitionMemoriaDevelopmental psychologyNeuroscienceEndocrinologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Endogenous P300b event-related potential (ERP) and behavioral performance measures, extracted during a visual memory scanning task, and spectral indices of resting electroencephalographic (EEG) activity, were assessed in 12 healthy elderly adults before and after double-blind oral administration of a placebo or glucose (50 mg) beverage. Glucoregulation was estimated by deriving a recovery index to categorize subjects as having better (BR) or poorer (PR) blood glucose recovery. Although glucoregulatory status did not impact on EEG or task performance, PR subjects exhibited reduced P300b areas relative to BR subjects prior to beverage administration. Glucose did not alter P300b or memory scanning performance but, regardless of glucoregulatory status, it increased the EEG power in the slow alpha frequency band. The study results suggest that peripheral glucoregulation can influence neuroelectric measures of cognition and that the acute ingestion of glucose can modulate central arousal processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.684

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuropsychobiologySame topicMemory and Neural MechanismsFrench-language works237,207