MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039479860 · doi:10.1139/v05-209

Linear free energy relationship and kinetic isotope effects as measures for the transition-state variation A case of the neophyl system

2005· article· en· W2039479860 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Salai Cheettu Ammal, Hiroshi Yamataka

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical Reaction Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersRikkyo UniversityUniversidad de La Frontera
KeywordsChemistryKinetic isotope effectKinetic energySubstituentHammett equationComputational chemistryAb initioTransition stateThermodynamicsTransition state theoryPhysical chemistryReaction rate constantCatalysisStereochemistryKineticsOrganic chemistryAtomic physicsDeuterium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ab initio calculations at the MP2/6-31G* level and density functional theory (B3LYP/6-311+G**) calculations have been performed on acid-catalyzed ionizations of substituted neophyl alcohols to investigate whether a variation of the transition-state (TS) structure is reflected in the kinetic isotope effects (KIE) and linear free energy relationship. The effect of substituents on KIEs, TS structures, and activation and reaction energies was calculated. This study revealed that a curved Brønsted-type plot could arise for a single-step process from the variation of TS structure with the substituent, whereas the Hammett plots with a dual-parameter treatment can not detect such TS variation. The variation of KIEs at various positions of neophyl alcohol reflects the variation of TS structures in a manner consistent with the More O'Ferrall – Jencks type reaction diagram analyses.Key words: transition-state variation, substituent effect, kinetic isotope effect, linear free energy relationship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.347

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicChemical Reaction MechanismsFrench-language works237,207