Effect of dynamic vulcanization on co‐continuous morphology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study examines the effect of dynamic vulcanization on the co‐continuous morphology in ethylene‐propylene‐diene terpolymer (EPDM)/polypropylene (PP) blends using a technique of morphology investigation involving focused ion beam (FIB) etching of the sample surface, followed by topological investigation of the sample surface using tapping mode atomic force microscopy (TMAFM). The FIB ion etching rates of EPDM and PP are distinctly different, and these differences create a significant topological contrast between the phases when subsequently analyzed by atomic force microscopy. This approach allows for the high‐resolution observation of dispersed EPDM, and phases as small as 100 nm, are clearly identified. Since it is shown that the etching rates of noncrosslinked and crosslinked EPDM are similar, it was necessary to selectively remove the noncrosslinked EPDM phase by solvent dissolution. This combination of techniques then allows for the clear distinction of polypropylene, as well as noncrosslinked and crosslinked EPDM phases in the blend. The high‐resolution micrographs together with the continuity data, surprisingly, indicate that a noncrosslinked co‐continuous EPDM phase (α‐network) transits to a finer network of crosslinked EPDM (β‐network) after dynamic crosslinking. It is suggested that this β‐network is produced as a result of the viscosity mismatch between the noncrosslinked and crosslinked EPDM melt occurring at the outer envelope of the α‐network during dynamic crosslinking. As the crosslinked material pulls away from the noncrosslinked material under dynamic melt mixing conditions, it creates a smearing effect. It is shown that the initial α‐network maintains its continuity and demonstrates a diminished pore diameter as crosslinking proceeds. Furthermore, when the noncrosslinked material is extracted almost no crosslinked phase (<1%) is found to be present in the extract. These results strongly indicate that the crosslinking proceeds initially at the outer envelope of the EPDM phase, and works its way toward the center. © 2006 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2006
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".