MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Prostatic involution in men taking finasteride is associated with elevated levels of insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins (IGFBPs)-2, -4, and -5

2000· article· en· W2039604806 on OpenAlexaff
Lynn N. Thomas, A. Stuart Wright, Catherine B. Lazier, Pinchas Cohen, Roger S. Rittmaster

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Prostate · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInsulin-like growth factor-binding proteinEndocrinologyFinasterideInternal medicineInvolution (esoterism)MedicineHyperplasiaProstateStainingGrowth factorAntiandrogenAndrogenInsulin-like growth factorAndrologyBiologyHormonePathologyCancerReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins (IGFBPs)-2, -4, and -5 are associated with upregulation of apoptosis in the ovary. The purpose of this study was to assess the roles of IGF-I and IGFBPs during involution of the prostate. Frozen and fixed tissue was collected by transurethral prostatectomy from Caucasian men, aged 52-82 years, scheduled for prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia, who took either placebo (n = 7) or the 5alpha-reductase inhibitor finasteride for 6 days to 6 years (n = 15) prior to surgery. METHODS: Intraprostatic androgen levels were measured by radioimmunoassay. Tissues were immunostained for IGF-I and IGFBP-2, -3, -4, and -5, and staining was quantitated by computerized image analysis. Serial sections were stained for markers of apoptosis (TUNEL and tissue transglutaminase) and IGFBP-2, -4, or -5. RESULTS: IGF-I staining was significantly decreased in the medium-term (18-43 days) treatment group and remained so for the duration of the study (P = 0.026). IGFBP-3 staining was unchanged in the early and medium-term treatment groups; however, a transient earlier rise in the level of this proapoptotic protein cannot be ruled out. The percentage of epithelial cell area staining positively for IGFBP-2 increased significantly, from 1.6 +/- 0.5 in the placebo group to 12.0 +/- 2.0 (P < 0.0001), and 7.6 +/- 1.9 (P = 0.003) in the short (6-13 days) and medium-term treatment groups, respectively. IGFBP-4 staining increased from 2.2 +/- 0.6 to 9.8 +/- 1.9 (P < 0.0001) and 7.4 +/- 1.2 (P = 0.004) in the short and medium-term groups, respectively, and IGFBP-5 staining increased from 0.2 +/- 0.1 to 3.8 +/- 2.0 (P = 0.004) in the medium-term group. The results from serial sections showed that IGFBP-2 and -4 costained with markers of apoptosis, while IGFBP-5 did not. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that IGFBP-2, -4, and -5 are associated with prostatic involution. Because of the timing and distribution of expression, we hypothesize that IGFBP-2 and -4 have a role as signals for apoptosis, but that IGFBP-5 likely does not.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.375
Threshold uncertainty score0.933

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe ProstateSame topicGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth FactorsFrench-language works237,207