MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039609164 · doi:10.1167/2.7.206

Effects of frequency content on the detection of anti-symmetry

2010· article· en· W2039609164 on OpenAlexaff
S. Mancini, Rick Gurnsey, Sharon L. Sally

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vision · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicColor perception and design
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsSymmetry (geometry)PhysicsAperture (computer memory)OpticsVisual angleGeometryAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE. Mancini et al. (2001, ARVO) measured the detectability of symmetrical patterns defined by checks that were of the same polarity (SP) or opposite polarity (OP) across a vertical axis of symmetry. Stimuli comprised black and white checks having widths of 0.037 to 0.297 degrees visual angle windowed within a circular aperture 9.5 degrees in diameter. The proportion (p) of SP checks matched across a vertical axis of symmetry ranged from 0 to 1. Patches with p = 1 are perfectly symmetrical (i.e., SP), those with p = 0 are anti-symmetrical (i.e., OP) and those with p = 0.5 are random. Results showed that SP and OP stimuli elicited similar thresholds for large checks. However, OP thresholds increased dramatically as check size was reduced, whereas SP thresholds did not. In fact, for the smallest check sizes, performance on the OP stimuli did not exceed chance even when p = 0. This suggests that the mechanism responsible for encoding OP stimuli works only on low frequency components of the display. We therefore asked if OP stimuli composed of large checks could be rendered undetectable if low frequencies are removed from the display. METHOD. Stimuli were constructed from black and white checks having widths of 0.297 degrees visual angle. The proportion of matching elements was varied as before to determine threshold. Stimuli were filtered with a high pass Butterworth filter having frequency cutoffs of 0 to 24 cycles/patch. An adaptive procedure was used to find threshold deviations (82% correct in a 2IFC) above and below p = 0.5. RESULTS. Thresholds were higher for the OP stimuli than SP stimuli for all cutoff frequencies. There was a general trend for thresholds to increase modestly as low frequencies were removed from both SP and OP stimuli. However, high pass filtering did not render the OP stimuli impossible to detect. CONCLUSION. The hypothesis that only low frequency channels contribute to the detection of OP stimuli must be rejected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of VisionSame topicColor perception and designFrench-language works237,207