Cultivated tomato has defects in both <i>S‐RNase</i> and <i>HT</i> genes required for stylar function of self‐incompatibility
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cultivated tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), a self-compatible species, evolved from self-incompatible (SI) species in the genus Lycopersicon following a breakdown of the self-incompatibility system. In order to elucidate the molecular basis of this breakdown in L. esculentum, we first analysed the stylar proteins with an in-gel assay for ribonuclease activity and 2D-PAGE. No S-RNase protein or its activity was detected in the style of L. esculentum. We then introduced the S6-RNase gene from an SI relative, L. peruvianum, into L. esculentum. However, the styles of transgenic plants expressing S6-RNase at levels comparable to those found in the L. peruvianum style were unable to reject self-pollen and L. peruvianum pollen in an allele-specific manner. This indicated that defect in the S-RNase expression was not the sole reason for the loss of self-incompatibility in tomato. The asparagine-rich HT protein, originally identified from the style of Nicotiana alata, is the other stylar factor involved in self-incompatibility reaction. We cloned and sequenced two distinct genes encoding HT-A and HT-B proteins from L. peruvianum (LpHT-A and LpHT-B) and L. esculentum (LeHT-A and LeHT-B). A frame shift mutation in the coding sequence of LeHT-A and a stop codon in the ORF of LeHT-B were found, and no LeHT-B transcript was detected in the style of L. esculentum. The results suggest that the breakdown of self-incompatibility in cultivated tomato is associated with loss-of-function mutations in both S-RNase and HT genes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".