Microstructure‐properties correlations in dynamically vulcanized nanocomposite thermoplastic elastomers based on PP/EPDM
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Thermoplastic vulcanized (TPV) nanocomposites were prepared in a laboratory mixer using EPDM, polypropylene of different viscosities, maleic anhydride modified polypropylene, an organo‐clay, and a sulfur‐based curing system. Based on the obtained results from X‐ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), differential scanning calorimeter, and mechanical properties, the microstructure of the prepared nanocomposites was found to be sensitive to the viscosity difference between the two phases and the clay content. X‐ray diffraction and TEM images of the TPV nanocomposites showed that clay was nearly exfoliated and randomly distributed into the polypropylene phase. The SEM photomicrographs of the dynamically vulcanized thermoplastic elastomer samples showed that the rubber particles were dispersed through the polypropylene in form of aggregates and their size increased with the introduction of clay. The nanoscale dimensions of the dispersed clay resulted in a significant improvement of the tensile modulus of the TPV nanocomposite samples, from 20 to 90% depending on clay content and the viscosity ratio of PP/EPDM. In the PP nanocomposites, the clay layers act as nucleating agents, resulting in higher crystallization temperature and reduced degree of crystallinity. Moreover, the oxygen permeability in the TPV nanocomposites was found to be lower than in unfilled but otherwise similar materials. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 47:207–217, 2007. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it