MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039737850 · doi:10.1038/ncomms6202

Hypoxia-mediated downregulation of miRNA biogenesis promotes tumour progression

2014· article· en· W2039737850 on OpenAlexafffund
Rajesha Rupaimoole, Sherry Y. Wu, Sunila Pradeep, Cristina Ivan, Chad V. Pecot, Kshipra M. Gharpure, Archana S. Nagaraja, Guillermo N. Armaiz-Peña, Michael H. McGuire, Behrouz Zand, Heather J. Dalton, Justyna Filant, Justin Bottsford Miller, Chunhua Lu, Nouara C. Sadaoui, Lingegowda S. Mangala, Morgan Taylor, Twan van den Beucken, Elizabeth Koch, Cristian Rodriguez‐Aguayo, Li Huang, Menashe Bar‐Eli, Bradly G. Wouters, Milan Radovich, Mircea Ivan, George A. Călin, Wei Zhang, Gabriel Lopez‐Berestein, Anil K. Sood

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Cancer InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCure Brain Cancer FoundationAmerican Society of Clinical OncologyGolfers Against CancerU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesNational Institutes of HealthOvarian Cancer Research FundRussell and Diana Hawkins Family FoundationConquer Cancer FoundationRGK FoundationNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchU.S. Department of Defense
KeywordsDroshaDownregulation and upregulationDicermicroRNACancer researchBiologyBiogenesisCell biologyHypoxia (environmental)Tumor progressionTumor microenvironmentGene silencingSmall interfering RNACancerTransfectionChemistryRNA interferenceCell cultureGeneticsRNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations185
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicMicroRNA in disease regulationFrench-language works237,207