Hydrodynamic simulation (computational fluid dynamics) of asymmetrically positioned tablets in the paddle dissolution apparatus: impact on dissolution rate and variability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this work was to investigate the dissolution rate from both the curved and planar surfaces of cylindrical compacts of benzoic acid, which were placed centrally and non-centrally at the base of the vessel of the paddle dissolution apparatus. The effect of fixing the compacts to a particular position on the variability of dissolution results was also examined. In addition, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was used to simulate fluid flow around compacts in the different positions in the vessel, and the relationship between the local hydrodynamics in the region of the compacts and the dissolution rate determined. The dissolution rate was found to increase from the centre position to the off-centre positions for each surface examined. There was a corresponding increase in maximum fluid velocities calculated from the CFD fluid flow simulations at a fixed distance from the compact. There was less variability in dissolution from compacts fixed to any of the positions compared with those that were not fixed. Fluid flow around compacts in different positions could be successfully modelled, and hydrodynamic variability examined, using CFD. The effect of asymmetric fluid flow was evident visually from the change in shape of the eroded compacts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".