Liver Hydatid Cyst Associated With Biliary Tract: Is it An Important Complication Indicator?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background : Hydatid cyst disease is a zoonotic disease caused by echinococccus granulosus. We aimed to investigate the relation between cyst location, size, laboratory values and presence of intracavitary bile duct, and also the effects of surgical procedures. Methods : Between March 2005 and January 2010, 100 patients who underwent surgery for hydatid cyst were reviewed retrospectively. Results : The patients included 63 women and 37 men. The mean age was 35.6 years. A series of 134 cysts were determined in 100 patients. Partial cystectomy and drainage were applied in 88, laparoscopic drainage in 7, and total cyst excision in 5 patients. Intraoperatively, cysts associated with bile duct were found in 48 patients. The mean cyst size was 11.8 cm in the patients with cysts associated with biliary tract and 8.6 cm in the others. Preoperative aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and gamma- glutamyl transferase (GGT ) values were higher in the patients with cysts associated with bile duct. The most common complications were biliary fistula and cavitary infection. The rate of major complication was 50%, and the mean hospital stay was 17.48 days in the patients with cysts associated with bile duct, while in the others they were 15.4% and 8.46 days, respectively. Conclusion : Large cysts and higher values of AST, ALP and GGT were related with the presence of intracavitary bile ducts. While the surgical techniques and cysts’ localization and stage had no effects, cysts associated with bile duct led to higher complication rates and longer hospital stays. doi:10.4021/jcs5w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".