Sedative Doses of Remifentanil Have Minimal Effect on ECoG Spike Activity During Awake Epilepsy Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The use of remifentanil for sedation during awake epilepsy surgery has been described in a case report. However, little information is available regarding the effect of remifentanil on the quality of intraoperative electrocorticography (ECoG). This study was designed to investigate the effect of sedative doses of remifentanil on ECoG interictal spike activity among patients undergoing awake anterior temporal lobectomy for refractory epilepsy. Ten adult patients were studied prospectively. After baseline EcoG recordings were obtained, remifentanil was administered as a continuous infusion at 0.1 microg/kg/min and the ECoG recorded continuously for 15 minutes. Recordings obtained before and during the administration of remifentanil were compared with respect to spike frequency and location. A trend toward a small decrease in spike frequency was observed as patients became increasingly somnolescent and background ECoG activity slowed. The difference was not statistically significant. Blood pressure and heart rate were not adversely affected by the administration of remifentanil. Respiratory rates decreased in all patients (mean decrease, 8 breaths/min) and one patient transiently developed a respiratory rate of 4 breaths per minute that elicited a decrease in the rate of remifentanil administration. Remifentanil administered at sedation doses does not adversely affect intraoperatively recorded interictal spike activity. Further investigation of the use of this drug during awake epilepsy surgery is warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".