MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039816272 · doi:10.2118/2000-062

Improvements in Lost-Circulation Control During Drilling Using Shear-Sensitive Fluids

2000· article· en· W2039816272 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lynne E. Johnson, Patrick Murphy, K. Arsanious

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian International Petroleum Conference · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsSchlumberger (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLost circulationPetroleum engineeringDrilling fluidDrillingGeologyCirculation (fluid dynamics)Shear (geology)Well controlComputer scienceMarine engineeringMechanicsMechanical engineeringEngineeringPetrologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Lost circulation is a major and costly drilling problem that severely affects the drilling curve and increases costs. To address this problem, a new treatment system has been developed that is pumped through the bit, for accurate placement into the lost-circulation zone. Such a plugging fluid, designed to gel after being sheared through a bit, cures the losses without the need for extra drill pipe trips, drilling of cement plugs, or time spent waiting on cement. The quick rate of cure allows operators to resume drilling with minimum downtime, usually within 30 minutes of a successful treatment. Introduction This paper describes the technology and performance of the system and presents field case studies that demonstrate its success in curing problems with total loss of circulation. In most cases, drilling was resumed in less than 1 hour, with total circulation, after successful treatment by this innovative lost-circulation technology. This system is called Shear Sensitive Plugging Fluid (SSPF). CONVENTIONAL LC TREATMENTS Lost circulation (LC) is major drilling problem that can be very detrimental to drilling practices and the economic curve. There are many causes of LC and various techniques for solutions. Techniques, in the past have included thixotropic cements, diesel oil bentonite plugs, dual injection plugs and LCM sweeps. Such methods of LC treatment have limited application, some more promising in minor losses and weak formations, others for vugular and fractured formations. LC can be a predictable problem in a developed field and contingency plans are often evaluated. Many operators can accurately predict the depth at which losses will be expected and the rate at which drilling fluid will be lost. One developed field, Chinchaga, in Northern Alberta, is such a case. If losses occur in this field, it will be at a depth of 900 m to 1050 m, in the top of the Debolt formation and will usually be total. The history of this field has had limited success with traditional LC treatments and require alternative solutions. Thixotropic cements have limited capability and require precious rig time. The success of cements depends on the thief zone characteristics. Large fractured, vugular formations are unable to support a 1700 kg/m3 plug with a thickening time of 90 minutes. The large, deviated, voids do not slow the slurry sufficiently to demonstrate its thixotropic characteristic. In addition, the time required to trip drill pipe out of and into the hole, waiting on cement and drilling out, is not cost effective for operators. The placement of LCM sweeps is a traditional solution that has plugged zones with low success rates. LCM plugs will often deteriorate over time due to tripping pipe and increased ECD across the treated zone. LCM's can occasionally plug drill nozzles requiring extra tripping or extreme well control methods if LC and kicks occur simultaneously. Dual injection fluids that inter-mix downhole at the LC zone depend on many factors to be successful.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian International Petroleum ConferenceSame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207