Phytase activity along the digestive tract of the broiler chick: A comparative study of an <i>Escherichia coli</i>-derived and <i>Peniophora lycii</i> phytase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Residual activity of an Escherichia coli-derived phytase and a commercially available Peniophora lycii phytase along the digestive tract of broiler chicks was compared in order to evaluate their relative resistance to hydrolysis in the digestive tract. Seventy-two 7-d-old male broiler chicks were grouped by weight into six blocks of three cages with four birds per cage. Three corn-soybean meal-based diets were randomly assigned to cages within each block. The three diets were a low P diet containing 3.9 g P kg -1 diet; and low P diet plus either E. coli-derived phytase or the P. lycii phytase at 1000 units kg -1 of feed. The chicks were fed experimental diets from 8 to 22 d of age. At the end of the study, chicks were killed and the contents of the crop, proventriculus and gizzard, jejunum and ileum were collected, freeze-dried, ground and analyzed for phytase activity. Escherichia coli-derived phytase had more residual activity at the proventriculus and gizzard, jejunum and ileum when compared with the P. lycii phytase (P < 0.0001). The E. coli-derived phytase may be more resistant to hydrolysis in the digestive tract when compared with the P. lycii phytase. Key words: Broiler chick, Escherichia coli phytase, residual phytase activity
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".