MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039829903 · doi:10.1021/bi010408o

Comparative Analysis of Folding and Substrate Binding Sites between Regulated Hexameric Type II Citrate Synthases and Unregulated Dimeric Type I Enzymes<sup>,</sup>

2001· article· en· W2039829903 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicEnzyme Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandom hexamerDimerChemistryCitrate synthaseCrystallographyStereochemistryAllosteric regulationProtein quaternary structureEnzymeProtein structureBiochemistryProtein subunit

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe the first structure determination of a type II citrate synthase, an enzyme uniquely found in Gram-negative bacteria. Such enzymes are hexameric and are strongly and specifically inhibited by NADH through an allosteric mechanism. This is in contrast to the widespread dimeric type I citrate synthases found in other organisms, which do not show allosteric properties. Our structure of the hexameric type II citrate synthase from Escherichia coli is composed of three identical dimer units arranged about a central 3-fold axis. The interactions that lead to hexamer formation are concentrated in a relatively small region composed of helix F, FG and IJ helical turns, and a seven-residue loop between helices J and K. This latter loop is present only in type II citrate synthase sequences. Running through the middle of the hexamer complex, and along the 3-fold axis relating dimer units, is a remarkable pore lined with 18 cationic residues and an associated hydrogen-bonded network. Also unexpected was the observation of a novel N-terminal domain, formed by the collective interactions of the first 52 residues from the two subunits of each dimer. The domain formed is rich in beta-sheet structure and has no counterpart in previous structural studies of type I citrate synthases. This domain is located well away from the dimer-dimer contacts that form the hexamer, and it is not involved in hexamer formation. Another surprising observation from the structure of type II E. coli citrate synthase is the unusual polypeptide chain folding found at the putative acetylcoenzyme A binding site. Key parts of this region, including His264 and a portion of polypeptide chain known from type I structures to form an adenine binding loop (residues 299-303), are shifted by as much as 10 A from where they must be for substrate binding and catalysis to occur. Furthermore, the adjacent polypeptide chain composed of residues 267-297 is extremely mobile in our structure. Thus, acetylcoenzyme A binding to type II E. coli citrate synthase would require substantial structural shifts and a concerted refolding of the polypeptide chain to form an appropriate binding subsite. We propose that this essential rearrangement of the acetylcoenzyme A binding part of the active site is also a major feature of allostery in type II citrate synthases. Overall, this study suggests that the evolutionary development of hexameric association, the elaboration of a novel N-terminal domain, introduction of a NADH binding site, and the need to refold a key substrate binding site are all elements that have been developed to allow for the allosteric control of catalysis in the type II citrate synthases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.845

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it