MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2039839258 · doi:10.4141/p99-027

Quackgrass (<i>Elytrigia repens</i>) management in flax (<i>Linum usitatissimum</i>)

2000· article· en· W2039839258 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
David A. Wall, M.A.H. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreharvestGlyphosateWeed controlAgronomyPerennial plantWeedLinumBiologyField experimentTrifolium repensDicambaHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Field studies were conducted at the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Centre, Morden, Manitoba from 1992 to 1996 to evaluate quackgrass management in flax with several graminicides applied at annual and perennial grass rates, and with preharvest glyphosate applied after postemergence graminicides. All graminicides at both application rates reduced quackgrass biomass. However, at annual grass rates, clethodim and sethoxydim were sometimes less effective at controlling quackgrass than quizalofop and fluazifop-P. There was some evidence that annual-rate applications of sethoxydim can result in increased quackgrass regrowth in the second year. Flax seed yields were not affected by the use of graminicides at annual grass rates compared with perennial grass rates, whereas untreated (weedy checks) flax had yield losses of up to 67% compared with weed-free plots. The use of preharvest glyphosate reduced second-year regrowth of quackgrass by half or more, compared with no preharvest glyphosate treatment. Where preharvest glyphosate had been applied, the weedy checks tended to have markedly less quackgrass regrowth than where graminicide treatments had been applied in the spring. This suggests that use of spring-applied graminicides may reduce the effectiveness of preharvest glyphosate to control quackgrass. However, use of a postemergence graminicide is often necessary to control annual grasses as well as quackgrass because flax yield is seriously affected by uncontrolled weed growth. A second experiment was conducted to compare the efficacy of liquid and dry formulations of glyphosate applied with water and 28-0-0 fertilizer as carriers. The three glyphosate formulations applied at 0.9 kg a.e. ha −1 were equally effective at reducing quackgrass biomass in flax without yield loss, but at 0.45 kg a.e. ha −1 , the liquid formulation was sometimes less effective. There was no consistent evidence that the use of liquid urea/ammonium nitrate fertilizer as a carrier, rather than water, affects the performance of either liquid or dry glyphosate formulations. Key words: Quackgrass, flax, graminicides, glyphosate, preharvest application

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.717
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicAgronomic Practices and Intercropping SystemsFrench-language works237,207