Mechanisms regulating ApTrkl, a Trk‐like receptor in Aplysia sensory neurons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An Aplysia Trk-like receptor (ApTrkl) was previously shown to be involved in cell wide long-term facilitation (LTF) and activation of ERK when serotonin (5-HT) is applied to the cell soma. The current study investigated the regulation of ApTrkl by overexpressing the receptor and several variants in Aplysia sensory neuron cultures. Kinase activity-dependent constitutive activation of ApTrkl was observed mainly on the plasma membrane. These studies revealed two modes of receptor internalization: (1) kinase activity-dependent internalization and (2) 5-HT-dependent, kinase activity-independent internalization. Both modes of internalization were ligand independent, and the action of 5-HT was mediated through G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). On the other hand, methiothepin, an inverse agonist of 5-HT GPCRs activated endogenous ApTrkl to the same extent as 5-HT, suggesting a transactivation mechanism due to a novel coupling of GPCRs to receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) activation that is also activated through inverse agonist binding. The neuropeptide sensorin could transiently activate ApTrkl but was not required for 5-HT-induced ApTrkl activation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".