Very Fast Oscillations Evoked by Median Nerve Stimulation in the Human Thalamus and Subthalamic Nucleus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Very fast oscillations (VFOs; 500-1,500 Hz) are associated with sensory-evoked potentials (SEPs), but their origin is unknown. To characterize the origins of VFOs, we studied 35 patients with deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes [15 with thalamic and 20 with the subthalamic nucleus (STN) electrodes]. We recorded median nerve stimulation-evoked SEPs from the thalamus and STN with microelectrodes during stereotactic surgery and from the contacts of the DBS electrodes postoperatively. We also examined the firing of individual neurons in thalamus in relation to the VFOs. In the thalamus, VFOs with frequencies around 1,000 Hz were superimposed on slow potentials. Both slow and fast SEP components showed phase reversals in the somatosensory thalamus [ventralis caudalis (Vc)]. Median nerve poststimulus time histograms showed that single thalamic neurons fired at preferred times at intervals between 0.8 to 1.2 ms that were synchronous with the VFOs, although the neurons fired only once or a few times per trial. In the STN, low-amplitude SEPs with VFOs were observed at a latency similar to the thalamic SEPs. The VFOs from STN probably represent volume conduction, possibly from the medial lemniscus. We conclude that the thalamic VFOs are generated within Vc and that they induce time-locked firing in a network of neurons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".