MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040046552 · doi:10.1080/10913670902812663

A Multi-Method Multi-Analytic Approach to Establishing Internal Construct Validity Evidence: The Sport Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale 2

2009· article· en· W2040046552 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueMeasurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyPerfectionism (psychology)Representativeness heuristicConstruct validityExternal validityConstruct (python library)Scale (ratio)Inclusion (mineral)Social psychologyMultidimensional scalingApplied psychologyInternal validityRelevance (law)PsychometricsClinical psychologyComputer scienceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article presents a chronology of three empirical studies that outline the measurement process by which two new subscales (Doubts about Actions and Organization) were developed and integrated into a revised version of CitationDunn, Causgrove Dunn, and Syrotuik's (2002) Sport Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (i.e., the Sport-MPS-2). All studies were designed to provide internal validity evidence that supported the inclusion of these new subscales into the instrument. Phase 1 determined that expert judges regarded the new Doubts about Actions and Organization items (n = 12) as possessing adequate levels of content-relevance and content-representativeness. Phases 2 and 3 examined the latent dimensionality of the Sport-MPS-2 using multidimensional scaling and factor analytic techniques. At a structural level, results indicated that the new Doubts about Actions and Organization subscales were suitable for inclusion in the Sport-MPS-2. Initial external validity evidence is presented via correlational and regression analyses surrounding the relationships between Sport-MPS-2 subscales and global self-esteem. The benefits of utilizing a multi-method multi-analytic approach in the initial stages of the construct validation process are discussed. Key words: Doubts about ActionsOrganizationSport-MPS-2scale construction ACKNOWLEDGMENTS A portion of this research was supported by a standard research grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (Grant #410-2003-1802) awarded to John Dunn. This research was part of the first author's doctoral dissertation, conducted at the University of Alberta. Notes 1To facilitate interpretation of results, the item numbers utilized in all tables, figures, and text throughout the manuscript refer to the ordered location of each item in the Sport-MPS-2. 2The 12 marker items were selected on the basis that they consistently demonstrated the best simple structure (CitationThurstone, 1947) and had strong pattern coefficients on their intended factors (M loading = .63, SD = .10) in previous studies that had factor analyzed the Sport-MPS (i.e., CitationDunn et al., 2002, 2006). 3Verbatim item descriptions of the original Sport-MPS items (n = 30) can be found in CitationDunn et al. (2006).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.707
Threshold uncertainty score0.695

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it