Exploring the relationship between funneled energy landscapes and two‐state protein folding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It should take an astronomical time span for unfolded protein chains to find their native state based on an unguided conformational random search. The experimental observation that folding is fast can be rationalized by assuming that protein energy landscapes are sloped towards the native state minimum, such that rapid folding can proceed from virtually any point in conformational space. Folding transitions often exhibit two-state behavior, involving extensively disordered and highly structured conformers as the only two observable kinetic species. This study employs a simple Brownian dynamics model of "protein particles" moving in a spherically symmetrical potential. As expected, the presence of an overall slope towards the native state minimum is an effective means to speed up folding. However, the two-state nature of the transition is eradicated if a significant energetic bias extends too far into the non-native conformational space. The breakdown of two-state cooperativity under these conditions is caused by a continuous conformational drift of the unfolded proteins. Ideal two-state behavior can only be maintained on surfaces exhibiting large regions that are energetically flat, a result that is supported by other recent data in the literature (Kaya and Chan, Proteins: Struct Funct Genet 2003;52:510-523). Rapid two-state folding requires energy landscapes exhibiting the following features: (i) A large region in conformational space that is energetically flat, thus allowing for a significant degree of random sampling, such that unfolded proteins can retain a random coil structure; (ii) a trapping area that is strongly sloped towards the native state minimum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".