Persistent Type II Endoleak Unrelated to an Anaconda Aortic Stent Graft Fulfilling the 3Bs Requirements of Biofunctionality, Biodurability, and Biocompatibility
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A patient was fitted with an Anaconda stent graft for which there was a persistent type II endoleak. Two subsequent attempts at embolization were unable to resolve the endoleak. The diameter of the aneurysm varied initially from 5.5 cm in diameter down to 4.8 cm but then later re-dilated to 6.1 cm, with evidence of persistent flow into the aneurysmal sac from the inferior mesenteric artery. Results from serial computed tomography scans demonstrated clear evidence of a type II endoleak that originated from the inferior mesenteric artery with outflow to a distal lumbar artery. The harvested stent graft did not show evidence of a device-related failure. The stent graft and its modular segments were found to have been properly deployed. Only a thin external capsule was evident at explantation. The internal wall of the device showed irregular and thin encapsulation with scattered mural thrombi, which were more prominent at the bifurcation of the main body of the device. Blood deposits and tissue development were sufficient to prevent blood oozing through the wall. The explanted Anaconda stent graft was devoid of any construction flaws or damage (fatigue of the textile or corrosion of the Nitinol wires) after implantation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".