MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2040339639 · doi:10.1109/tdmr.2015.2401035

Study of Near-Surface Stresses in Silicon Around Through-Silicon Vias at Elevated Temperatures by Raman Spectroscopy and Simulations

2015· article· en· W2040339639 on OpenAlexafffund
Ye Zhu, Jiye Zhang, Hong Yu Li, Chuan Seng Tan, Guangrui Xia

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D IC and TSV technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceSiliconStress (linguistics)Raman spectroscopyThermal expansionShrinkageComposite materialThrough-silicon viaSpectroscopyOptoelectronicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The near-surface stress distribution around Cu through-silicon vias (TSVs) was studied by micro-Raman spectroscopy along with finite-element analysis from room temperature to 100°C. Temperature-dependent measurements, along with simulations, revealed that the stresses near TSVs can have two components: 1) the preexisting stress before copper filling; and 2) the coefficients of thermal expansion (CTE)-mismatch-induced stress. The CTE-mismatch-induced stress resulted in a mobility change, and a keep-out zone (KOZ) at elevated temperatures was also estimated, where the KOZ was defined as the region with a mobility change larger than or equal to 10%. Higher temperatures were shown to reduce the CTE-mismatch-induced stress component and resulted in the shrinkage of KOZs in Si. The preexisting stress was shown to be significant in a region equal to or larger than the KOZs induced by the CTE-mismatch-induced stress only and should be characterized and considered in the KOZ determination and the circuit design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Device and Materials ReliabilitySame topic3D IC and TSV technologiesFrench-language works237,207